LSSU Anchors

The history is there...follow as the tradition returns!

Re: LSSU Anchors

Postby BG84 » Sat Nov 11, 2017 2:43 pm

jbakerifm wrote:Sure wish we could learn how to put the pedal down and finish teams off
Yup. The first 15 minutes were great. Then the boys let the game slip away. Hit the net! Two points are better than zero, though.
User avatar
BG84
Chick
Chick
 
Posts: 251
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Columbus

Re: LSSU Anchors

Postby unfalconbelievable » Sat Nov 11, 2017 7:49 pm

There are three to four teams every year that sit on top of this league every year and separate themselves from the others at the bottom. BG is typically one of these teams. The problem is the though they may be better teams the separation is not that great, the lack of separation creates dozens of 2-1, 1-0, 3-2 and a lot of OT games.

Problem with BG and the teams that are good in this league.

1) Lack of scoring
2) Lack of Scoring
3) Lack of Scoring
4) Lack of Scoring
5) Lack of Scoring
unfalconbelievable
Peregrine
Peregrine
 
Posts: 793
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 11:31 pm

Re: LSSU Anchors

Postby gmartin » Sat Nov 11, 2017 8:45 pm

How many goals this year have we given up in the last 2 minutes of the period. Wayyyyyyy to many.
gmartin
Peregrine
Peregrine
 
Posts: 4761
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 7:20 am
Location: Indianapolis

Re: LSSU Anchors

Postby pdt1081 » Sat Nov 11, 2017 8:48 pm

End of 2, 1-1. Shots are 7-10, them.

McClain is taking a beating.
Phi or Die
User avatar
pdt1081
Peregrine
Peregrine
 
Posts: 2749
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 12:09 pm

Re: LSSU Anchors

Postby unfalconbelievable » Sat Nov 11, 2017 8:51 pm

1-1 after 1st.
Shots 10-7 in favor of them.
unfalconbelievable
Peregrine
Peregrine
 
Posts: 793
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 11:31 pm

Re: LSSU Anchors

Postby pdt1081 » Sat Nov 11, 2017 9:44 pm

End of 2, BG leads 3-1. Shots are 19-19.

BG with 2 shorthanded goals in the game.

Interesting how extending your elbow into someone's facemask is NOT considered contact to the head.
Phi or Die
User avatar
pdt1081
Peregrine
Peregrine
 
Posts: 2749
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 12:09 pm

Re: LSSU Anchors

Postby pdt1081 » Sat Nov 11, 2017 10:46 pm

5-2 FINAL.
Phi or Die
User avatar
pdt1081
Peregrine
Peregrine
 
Posts: 2749
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 12:09 pm

Re: LSSU Anchors

Postby gmartin » Sat Nov 11, 2017 10:54 pm

1st place Falcons. At least for another 30 min.
gmartin
Peregrine
Peregrine
 
Posts: 4761
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 7:20 am
Location: Indianapolis

Re: LSSU Anchors

Postby BG84 » Sun Nov 12, 2017 6:06 pm

In the Lakers' second goal, why didn't the fact that a Laker was in the crease without the puck, and more or less on top of Bednard, cause the goal to be disallowed?
User avatar
BG84
Chick
Chick
 
Posts: 251
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Columbus

Re: LSSU Anchors

Postby BGDrew » Sun Nov 12, 2017 6:34 pm

BG84 wrote:In the Lakers' second goal, why didn't the fact that a Laker was in the crease without the puck, and more or less on top of Bednard, cause the goal to be disallowed?


The officials probably determined that McDonald’s penalty forced the Laker into Bednard/the crease.
Check out our new BGSU hockey site: http://www.bgsuhockey.com
User avatar
BGDrew
Peregrine
Peregrine
 
Posts: 6226
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 3:11 pm

Re: LSSU Anchors

Postby pdt1081 » Sun Nov 12, 2017 7:02 pm

BG84 wrote:In the Lakers' second goal, why didn't the fact that a Laker was in the crease without the puck, and more or less on top of Bednard, cause the goal to be disallowed?

Because 90% of the officials in the WCHA are not competent enough to officiate a PeeWee game, let alone division 1 NCAA.
Phi or Die
User avatar
pdt1081
Peregrine
Peregrine
 
Posts: 2749
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 12:09 pm

Re: LSSU Anchors

Postby jbakerifm » Sun Nov 12, 2017 10:38 pm

BGDrew wrote:
BG84 wrote:In the Lakers' second goal, why didn't the fact that a Laker was in the crease without the puck, and more or less on top of Bednard, cause the goal to be disallowed?


The officials probably determined that McDonald’s penalty forced the Laker into Bednard/the crease.


That was a weak hook, he barely brushed him. Guy was out of control going to the net. The problem with the Lakers is they commit soooo many holding, hooking and interference penalties that the refs can't call against them constantly. And they end up evening things up with crappy calls against the other day team.
jbakerifm
Egg
Egg
 
Posts: 145
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2014 10:22 pm

Previous

Return to Hockey

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests